Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds action that checks if an audit is required for a given PR #776

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

0xDEnYO
Copy link
Contributor

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO commented Aug 22, 2024

Which Jira task belongs to this PR?

Why did I implement it this way?

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • This pull request is as small as possible and only tackles one problem
  • I have added tests that cover the functionality / test the bug
  • I have updated any required documentation

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced an automated auditing workflow for pull requests that modify or add Solidity files, enhancing the review process.
    • Automatically labels PRs based on the presence of Solidity contracts, streamlining compliance with auditing standards.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow, checkAuditRequired.yml, has been implemented to automate the auditing process for pull requests that modify or add Solidity files in the src/ directory. This workflow checks for changes in relevant files upon specific PR events and assigns appropriate audit labels based on the presence of Solidity contracts.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/checkAuditRequired.yml Introduced a workflow to automate audit requirement checks by labeling pull requests based on modifications to Solidity files within the src/ directory.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A workflow hops in, brightening the day.
Labels for audits, clear and neat,
Helping each PR stay on its feet.
With Solidity contracts in sight,
Now audits are easy, all done just right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 233fcbc and 40309c5.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/checkAuditRequired.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/checkAuditRequired.yml

36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:8:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:26:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:31:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/checkAuditRequired.yml (5)

20-23: LGTM! Repository checkout is correctly configured.

The fetch-depth: 0 ensures all history is fetched, which is necessary for the diff operation.


25-32: LGTM! Label removal is correctly configured.

The step correctly removes the specified labels from the PR.


75-81: LGTM! Label assignment is correctly configured.

The step correctly assigns the appropriate label based on the audit requirement.


83-115: LGTM! Label verification is correctly implemented.

The script ensures that exactly one of the two labels is assigned, maintaining the integrity of the labeling process.


117-117: LGTM! Completion message is clear and informative.

The message provides clear feedback on the successful completion of the GitHub Action.

Comment on lines +36 to +70
run: |

##### get all files modified by this PR
FILES=$(git diff --name-only origin/main HEAD)

##### make sure that there are modified files
if [[ -z $FILES ]]; then
echo -e "\033[31mNo files found. This should not happen. Please check the code of the Github action. Aborting now.\033[0m"
echo "CONTINUE=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi

##### Initialize empty variables
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS=""

##### go through all modified file names/paths and identify contracts with path 'src/*'
while IFS= read -r FILE; do
if echo "$FILE" | grep -E '^src/.*\.sol$'; then
##### contract found
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS="${PROTECTED_CONTRACTS}${FILE}"$'\n'
fi
done <<< "$FILES"

##### if none found, exit here as there is nothing to do
if [[ -z "$PROTECTED_CONTRACTS" ]]; then
echo -e "\033[32mNo protected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[32mAssigning label 'AuditNotRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
exit 0
else
echo -e "\033[31mProtected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[31mAssigning label 'AuditRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi

echo "PROTECTED_CONTRACTS: $PROTECTED_CONTRACTS"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quote variables to prevent globbing and word splitting.

The shell script contains unquoted variables, which can lead to issues with globbing and word splitting. Address the shellcheck warnings by quoting variables.

Apply this diff to quote the variables:

 FILES=$(git diff --name-only origin/main HEAD)

 if [[ -z "$FILES" ]]; then
   echo -e "\033[31mNo files found. This should not happen. Please check the code of the Github action. Aborting now.\033[0m"
   echo "CONTINUE=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
 fi

 while IFS= read -r FILE; do
   if echo "$FILE" | grep -E '^src/.*\.sol$'; then
     PROTECTED_CONTRACTS="${PROTECTED_CONTRACTS}${FILE}"$'\n'
   fi
 done <<< "$FILES"
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
run: |
##### get all files modified by this PR
FILES=$(git diff --name-only origin/main HEAD)
##### make sure that there are modified files
if [[ -z $FILES ]]; then
echo -e "\033[31mNo files found. This should not happen. Please check the code of the Github action. Aborting now.\033[0m"
echo "CONTINUE=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi
##### Initialize empty variables
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS=""
##### go through all modified file names/paths and identify contracts with path 'src/*'
while IFS= read -r FILE; do
if echo "$FILE" | grep -E '^src/.*\.sol$'; then
##### contract found
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS="${PROTECTED_CONTRACTS}${FILE}"$'\n'
fi
done <<< "$FILES"
##### if none found, exit here as there is nothing to do
if [[ -z "$PROTECTED_CONTRACTS" ]]; then
echo -e "\033[32mNo protected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[32mAssigning label 'AuditNotRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
exit 0
else
echo -e "\033[31mProtected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[31mAssigning label 'AuditRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi
echo "PROTECTED_CONTRACTS: $PROTECTED_CONTRACTS"
run: |
##### get all files modified by this PR
FILES=$(git diff --name-only origin/main HEAD)
##### make sure that there are modified files
if [[ -z "$FILES" ]]; then
echo -e "\033[31mNo files found. This should not happen. Please check the code of the Github action. Aborting now.\033[0m"
echo "CONTINUE=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi
##### Initialize empty variables
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS=""
##### go through all modified file names/paths and identify contracts with path 'src/*'
while IFS= read -r FILE; do
if echo "$FILE" | grep -E '^src/.*\.sol$'; then
##### contract found
PROTECTED_CONTRACTS="${PROTECTED_CONTRACTS}${FILE}"$'\n'
fi
done <<< "$FILES"
##### if none found, exit here as there is nothing to do
if [[ -z "$PROTECTED_CONTRACTS" ]]; then
echo -e "\033[32mNo protected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[32mAssigning label 'AuditNotRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=false" >> $GITHUB_ENV
exit 0
else
echo -e "\033[31mProtected contracts found in Git Diff.\033[0m"
echo -e "\033[31mAssigning label 'AuditRequired' to this PR.\033[0m"
echo "AUDIT_REQUIRED=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV
fi
echo "PROTECTED_CONTRACTS: $PROTECTED_CONTRACTS"
Tools
actionlint

36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:8:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:26:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


36-36: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:31:33: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants